Medico-Legal
Responsibility in Singapore
by
Dr Yeo Khee Quan
In
line with our ‘Focus’ theme this issue, we present a review of a book on
medico-legal issues. To ensure an objective point of view, this review was
undertaken by a member of the medical profession.
Medico-Legal
Responsibility in Singapore by Dr Yeo Khee Quan is subtitled ‘Changes in a
changing medical, legal, social and economic setting’ . This aptly captures
what the author attempts to do in this 154-page softcover book.
Dr
Yeo, a specialist in private practice, is one of an increasing number of doctors
who have obtained degrees unrelated to the medical field; in this case, an LLB (Hons)
and an LLM. This book is based on the thesis which he submitted to the National
University of Singapore for his LLM degree.
The
book is targeted at a diverse audience. Firstly and most obviously, it is
intended as a guide for doctors. This includes doctors at all levels of
seniority, from the junior House Officer all the way to the Senior Consultant,
as well as doctors in a hospital-based or private practice environment.
Dr
Yeo, however, also makes points and raises issues that are relevant to lawyers
engaged in medico-legal work, as well as administrators of hospitals and managed
health organisations (HMOs).
Divided
into nine main chapters, the author first discusses medical responsibility in
the doctor-patient relationship. The problem of defining when such a
relationship is established and when it is terminated are important in
determining the physician’s liability when things go wrong. He also touches on
the views of the courts with regards to this special relationship, and how these
views have changed over the years such that this relationship can no longer be
presumed to exist in all litigation cases.
The
Bolam controversy is then explained in sufficient detail. He quotes
Judicial Commissioner Amarjeet Singh, who reaffirms the continued relevance of
the Bolam test in Singapore in a case discussion. The medical
responsibilities in a hospital practice as well as training institutes are the
subject of the next two chapters, detailing the duty and liability of doctors as
well as the hospital/training institute — a must read for all hospital
administrators!
The
next chapter deals with the medical responsibility of third party payers, a
relevant subject in these days of managed healthcare. Tort, vicarious,
corporate, monopolistic and coverage liability are all examined, with relevant
examples of cases (thankfully, none local as yet) raised and discussed. The
development of HMOs, introducing the element of cost control as a factor in
medical management, creates the very real fear that patients will not receive
the most appropriate or most effective medical treatment, but only the cheapest.
Such issues and their impact on the quality of care of patients have not as yet
arisen in Singapore.
Another
relevant subject is covered in the next chapter, detailing medical
responsibility in the application of information technology. The almost
ubiquitous personal computer and the explosion in Internet usage has invaded the
field of medicine as well. Medical databases already exist in Singapore and the
problems of legal ownership of the data, liability in the case of unauthorised
access or loss of data integrity, resulting in adverse patient outcomes, are all
touched upon.
The
book then ends off with chapters on the medical institutes and statutes of
relevance in Singapore, a thought-provoking list of suggested reforms and,
finally, a short postscript on important changes in the medico-legal scene since
the book was originally written.
It
is, overall, a comprehensive and well-written book on a topic of such great
scope. It is a testament to the speed at which policies and programmes change
that several new issues have appeared since the book was published which need to
be addressed, including the introduction of Casemix to all restructured
hospitals and the division of medical facilities in Singapore into two separate,
competing ‘clusters’ .
Dr
Yeo quotes many relevant local and foreign cases to illustrate his points. What
struck me while reading the book is that many of the issues have not yet
developed in Singapore or, if they have, a large number have been settled out of
court, with sensitive information withheld by the medical defence societies or
hospitals. I would have wished that the relevant people in charge were more
forthcoming, as the benefit from the discussion of more cases with a local
flavour would surely lead to more informed doctors, resulting in less
litigation, less pay outs and less adverse publicity!
My
only real criticisms are reserved for how the information is presented in this
book. It appears to have been published by the author privately, from the lack
of any indication of a publishing house in the pages. The typesetting also
leaves something to be desired and would benefit from revamping to make it an
easier read.
I
would also like to point out that all his Internet references are inaccurate,
with unique resource locators (URLs) linked to local files probably on his own
computer hard disk at the time of writing, rather than the appropriate addresses
on the World Wide Web.
In
concluding, I would recommend this book to any health care professional in
Singapore as an essential read along with all the other clinical journals and
texts that are a more familiar part of our practice. A greater awareness of our
responsibilities and liabilities as doctors is essential if we wish to avoid
charges of negligence and litigation. I also hope that the author will keep
updating the information in subsequent editions so as to keep this unique book
current.
Dr
Jeffrey Goh
Radiologist
Department of Diagnostic Radiology
Tan Tock Seng Hospital