|
LEGAL UPDATES |
Legislation
Financial Advisers (Amendment) Act 2003 (A15/2003)
The Financial Advisers (Amendment) Act 2003 was passed on 2 September 2003, gazetted on 6 October 2003, and comes into operation on 22 December 2003.
The changes to the Financial Advisers Act (‘FAA’) (Cap 110) are primarily technical modifications to clarify the MAS’ administration of the FAA and improve the consistency of requirements between the FAA and SFA.
To implement the changes, the MAS has issued the following regulations and notification:
Securities and Futures (Amendment) Act 2003 (A16/2003)
The Securities and Futures (Amendment) Act 2003 was passed in Parliament on 2 September 2003 and gazetted on 6 October 2003. All the provisions of the Securities and Futures (Amendment) Act 2003 will come into force on 22 December 2003 except for ss 56(e), (g) and (h), which have not come into force yet.
Sections 56(e), (g) and (h) deal with amendments to s 239 of the SFA in relation to invitations to the public by a prescribed corporation to deposit money with or to lend money to the prescribed corporation. Such invitations do not constitute a public offer for subscription or purchase of debentures of the prescribed corporation.
The Securities and Futures (Amendment) Act 2003 makes changes to the prospectus regime in the Securities and Futures Act (‘SFA’) (Cap 289). Most notably, the Securities and Futures (Amendment) Act 2003 introduces a new document, the offer information statement.
To implement the amendments, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (‘MAS’) has issued the following regulations and notification, which will also take effect on 22 December 2003:
Acts Passed But Not in Force Yet
The following Acts have been passed in Parliament in November 2003. However, the Acts have not been gazetted and have not come into force yet:
For a summary of the changes to be made pursuant to the above Acts, please refer to the December 2003 issue of The Singapore Law Gazette.
Planning (Amendment) Act 2003
The Planning (Amendment) Act 2003 has been passed in Parliament on 11 November 2003. However, the Act has not been gazetted and has not come into force yet.
Among other things, the Planning Act (Cap 232) will be amended to introduce a new tax, the temporary development levy and to update the definition of the Development Baseline.
Brief highlights are as follows:
It is expected that s 36 will eventually be repealed and re-enacted to further revise the definition of Development Baseline to disregard any development for the land as allocated in:
(a) the Master Plan approved by the Governor in Council on 5 August 1958; or
(b) the Master Plan as the result of any alteration or addition made under s 6(1) of the repealed Planning Act prior to 24 April 1982;
- a new s 39A will provide that the Minister for National Development may remit the development charge payable by any person in whole or in part; and
- there will be introduced a new Part VA (consisting of new ss 40A to 40D) relating to the imposition of a temporary development levy. New s 40A provides for the imposition of a new tax (temporary development levy) in respect of the grant of planning permission or conservation permission which is for a specified period of 10 years or less and sets out the basis for determining the temporary development levy.
Income Tax (Amendment) Act 2003
The Income Tax (Amendment) Act 2003 has been passed in Parliament on 11 November 2003. However, the Act has not been gazetted and has not come into force yet.
The Income Tax Act (Cap 134) will be amended to implement the income tax changes announced in the 2003 Budget Statement.
Some of the amendments are as follows:
(a) the foreign-sourced income is subject to tax of a similar character to income tax under the law of the territory outside Singapore from which the income is received;
(b) the highest rate of tax levied on gains or profits from any trade or business carried on by any company in that territory is not less than 15% at the time the foreign-sourced income is received in Singapore; and
(c) the Comptroller of Income Tax is satisfied that the tax exemption will be beneficial to the person resident in Singapore.
Central Provident Fund (Amendment) Act 2003
The Central Provident Fund (Amendment) Act 2003 has been passed in Parliament on 11 November 2003. However, the Act has not been gazetted and has not come into force yet.
Section 24 of the Central Provident Act (Cap 36) provides that precious metals and securities purchased by a CPF member and the proceeds from the sale of such precious metals and securities and any moneys in any fixed deposit account maintained by a member with a bank, under any investment scheme established under CPF subsidiary legislation which allows the member to invest his CPF savings and whereby the member is obliged to repay the proceeds into the Central Provident Fund, shall not be attached, sequestered, levied upon for or in respect of any debt or claim or be subject to any right of set-off by the bank for any debt owing by the member to the bank.
Section 24 will be amended to clarify that benefits derived from insurance policies (including investment-linked insurance policies) are protected under the section.
High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) (Amendment) Bill 2003 (B32/2003)
The High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) (Amendment) Bill 2003 proposes to amend the High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act (Cap 123) to implements the recommendations of the Attorney-General’s Chambers in its Consultation Paper, Admiralty Jurisdiction of the High Court: Arrest of Ships on Demise Charter to Secure the Obligations of the Demise Charterer (LRRD 1/2003).
The provisions of the High Court (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Act as they presently stand do not permit a claimant to arrest a vessel under demise charter (bareboat charter) even where the demise charterer is himself the person liable to the claimant. If a debt is owed by the beneficial owner of the ship, a claimant may arrest that ship to secure payment of the debt, subject to certain conditions. However, if the debt is owed by a demise charterer, the claimant may not arrest that same ship even though the demise charterer has the same control of the ship as an owner.
Maritime claims may be pursued by an action in personam or an action in rem. An action in personam is an action against the defendant personally. An action in rem, unique to admiralty law, is an action that is pursued against the ‘thing’ (‘the res’) rather than a person. The ‘thing’ is usually the ship and the action is commenced by the arrest of the ship.
Section 4(4) will be amended and modelled after the UK Supreme Court Act 1981. At present, under s 4(4), the High Court may arrest a ship in connection with which a claim arises, only where the person who would be liable in personam is the full beneficial owner of the ship. The amendment extends the present right of action in rem by allowing the High Court to arrest a ship where either the owner or the charterer by demise (the bareboat charterer) is the person who would be liable in personam. A claimant who succeeds in establishing a claim in relation to the ship is entitled to satisfaction from the proceeds of the sale of the ship, notwithstanding that the owner of the ship is not liable in personam on the claim. Such an owner is, however, not personally liable for any shortfall between the judgment sum and proceeds from the sale of the ship; his liability extends only to the loss of the ship (or the value of the security put up to obtain its release). The amendment therefore creates not only procedural rights but also certain substantive rights in favour of a claimant.
Human Organ Transplant (Amendment) Bill 2003 (B33/2003)
This Bill seeks to amend the Human Organ Transplant Act (Cap 131A):
Elizabeth Wong
Allen and Gledhill